Wed 27 November
10:30–16:00
Lecture Series — IN(DI)VISIBLE INFRASTRUCTURES: BRIDGING OVERSEEN WORLDS
INTRODUCTION
Infrastructures, as we typically know them, are considered to be organisational, economic, physical and digital structures (e.g. roads, buildings, trains, power supplies, data centres and fibre-optic cables among others) that frame the flow of life within society. In its etymology, the root infra- means ‘below’ or ‘beneath’, speaking towards the many layers of the material world, as well as the invisible layers or labours of what it takes to have a world.
The material world comes from a raw materiality that cannot be thought outside of its local life-world. In contrast, globalised economies depend on infrastructures pretending that these local life-worlds do not exist. The global circulation of goods, services, labour, knowledge and capital is based on infrastructures that violently decontextualize them whilst simultaneously suppressing their visibility. What is at work here are power dynamics—constructed through commodification of species and labour; dispossession and colonial violence—that are never neutral and result in the destruction of many worlds. They result in infrastructures that are not just material, but also deeply ideological. They also need to be understood in terms of knowledge, ideas and language. This worldview contrasts sharply with deeply rooted beliefs in bio-regions and also indigenous cosmologies, where the natural world and landscapes are seen as alive and interconnected. In this perspective, humans are part of a web of relationships with other beings, emphasising respect, care, and reciprocity amongst all forms of existence.
Within our current world, the more-than-human realm is often stripped of its life-world in order to make infrastructure. Oil was once a relationship between algae and zooplankton deep within the Earth over a mass amount of time before its extraction as an energy source. Wood was once engaged within the tree communicating with various species and molecules before it became a device for mass construction. Soil, in the words of Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, is said to be an “infrastructure of life” in the way that it is both a home to species and a source of agricultural prosperity and yet, it has become a finite resource due to techno-agricultural production leaving 33% of today’s soil already degraded and over 90% is set to become degraded by 2050 (FAO and ITPS, 2015; IPBES, 2018).
A more clear-eyed acknowledgement to the more-than-human world would enhance our capacity for connection, reciprocity and coexistence. Through valuing the overseen worlds and revisioning humans aligned with living principles, how, as artists, researchers and designers, do we utilise various lenses of investigation, methodologies, language and practice to interrupt, resist and restructure infrastructures?
How can we understand the hidden and invisible forces that shape our world where artistic research becomes a revelatory device? Is it even possible to alter an infrastructure at a level of depth and if so, what could be the means of such dismantling and exposures? How can designers develop alternative systems aligned with living principles? How could these altered structures be based on reciprocity and care rather than extraction? How can this lead towards building more ecological processes/ practices and a new design paradigm? How do communities (human and more-than-human) come together to do so? How to hack an infrastructure in which the flow is altered where alterity produces a critical difference, weird, other, new? How can art & design actively engage in challenging those hegemonies? How could design play a key role in envisioning and activating alternative systems if aligned with living principles?
How do we critique, resist and re-vision infrastructures connected to, for example, colonial violence, and even more so, how do we dream and rebuild new infrastructures? Acting as a testing ground to usher in dialogue in this lecture series symposium, we invite guests to explore throughout their artistic research, the means and methods of interrogating infrastructures and also to reveal the ecological value of the unseen more than human worlds. On one end, it is about critique and revelation. On the other end, there comes a moment of action and critical imagination to interrupt and re-create. We ask, what is the role of artistic research and design within this process? How can art & design become agents of change towards new reciprocal and caring economies actively shaping and activating alternative infrastructures? How can design create systems of care, collaboration, and reciprocity? And what does it mean to hold these discussions across scales–in a gallery, an art academy and through the field?
PROGRAM
Monday 25 November, 10:30 – 17:30
Wednesday 27 November, 10:30 – 14:30
SCHEDULE – MONDAY 25 NOVEMBER
10:30 – 10:45
In(di)visible Infrastructures, Bridging Overseen Worlds introduction
10:45
Artistic and Digital Infrastructures
With Dr. Ramon Amaro and Dr. Sebastian Olma, moderated by Victoria McKenzie
This conversation between Dr. Ramon Amaro—Senior Researcher of Digital Cultures at Het Nieuwe Institute, critical theorist, engineer and sociologist by training—and Dr. Sebastian Olma, writer, critic, and Professor of Cultural and Creative Industries at CARADT—sets the stage for a critical contemplation on infrastructures. Both academics present notions of infrastructure as it pertains to their practices within the art world, as well as the problematics of having infrastructure so heavily entwined with the ontologies of contemporary capitalism and neoliberalism. How do we resist the very materials we have internalised? What are the invisibilised or perhaps psychosocial dimensions of infrastructures that might pertain having a fugitive relationship to them? How does one not destroy the very structures that exist, but hack them in a way that the material might present a newness—of structure and of self. What is the role of art within this system of hacking?
12:00
More than Human Unseen; hybrid-weird collaborative communities
With Adriana Knouf, Louis Alderson-Bythell, Samantha Jenkins, moderated by Prof. Delfina Fantini van Ditmar
Hybrid-weird collaborative communities, exemplified by lichens and extremophiles: Lichens, illustrate the value of unclassified symbiotic relationships highlighting the significance of living and collaborating with others. These organisms act as ecosystem builders, providing food sources and habitats for various species. They can additionally survive in extreme conditions on planet Earth as well as in extraterrestrial space. Who composes these entities? What implications does this have for our economy? When we consider these relationships in the context of society, they suggest transformations and new ways of becoming something beyond our current understanding—envisioning humanity as a community that transcends categorisation. What can the creation of a Lichen clock illuminate about a particular socio-economic context of artistic production and how might the existence of Lichen clocks allow a reflection on alternative infrastructures? About extremophiles, what value do their unusual forms bring? What can be learned from their remarkable resilience to environmental stressors that demonstrate their adaptability to life in extreme conditions?
Collective panel: Ramon Amaro, Sebastian Olma, Adriana Knouf, Louis Alderson-Bythell, Samantha Jenkins. Moderated by Victoria McKenzie and Delfina Fantini van Ditmar
13:30 – 14:30
Lunch Break
14:30
Abnormal Plants and Anomalous Arts: Troubling the Non/Human Norm (Online)
With Aliya Say
Тhe talk will explore the ways in which botanical anomalies and artistic practices confront and destabilise our normative ideas of ‘human-nature’ interaction. Through examining the works of artists and scientists such as Emma Kunz and Kate Brown, we’ll delve into how abnormalities in plants, human intervention, and visionary art can reveal the invisible aspects of ecological interdependence, historical trauma, and the impacts of human-driven environmental change. Focusing on the notion of teratology—the study of abnormalities in life forms—we will draw on the works of diverse artists, including artist-botanist Mary Anne Stebbing, artist-mystic Emma Kunz and contemporary artist Nona Inescu, to move beyond aestheticised forms and discuss the resilience and adaptability of plants in response to change, whether genetic, anthropogenic, or even mystical, and revealing ‘hidden principles’ in nature.
We will delve into the stories of man-made anomalies, particularly in the Pripyat Marshes, site of the Chernobyl catastrophe (subject of heightened attention recently, following the invasion and occupation of the Exclusion Zone by the Russian military). We will discuss teratologic malformations that span centuries, continents and histories and point to the toxic exposures that have reconfigured landscapes and bodies, whether of humans or plants. Mary Anne Stebbing’s depiction of the monstrous flora, Emma Kunz’s attempts to restore the balance in human bodies and communities through her mystical healing practices, and Kate Brown’s quest to visualise the effects of man’s destruction and toxic imprint on ecosystems appear to be linked in an unlikely, one could even say anomalous, chain.
16:00
Arabidopsis Thaliana in Outer Space
With Anna Mikkola
The talk Arabidopsis Thaliana in Outer Space recounts the story of the first plant ever grown from seed to seed in microgravity by weaving text with images and videos. Retelling how Arabidopsis thaliana plants took root and germinated seeds in microgravity on the Soviet Salyut 7 space station in 1982, Anna will touch upon paranoias embedded in scientific work during the Cold War. The astrobiologist Dr. Danguolė Švegždienė, who worked at the Lithuanian scientific laboratory where the successful astrobotany devices were built, told me that the Soviet director of the laboratory was not transparent about the details of the experiments and did not, for example, tell the scientists whether the plants got taken to outer space. Tuning into the plant's language and knowing that roots grow differently in microgravity than on the Earth could help scientists interpret where they have lived despite the secrecies. The talk also brings forth the beneficial effects of growing plants on a space station on astronauts' mental health. Using feminist science studies that emphasise embodiment, situatedness, and subjectivity, the talk reflects on the concepts of rooting and alienation through the history of growing plants in microgravity on a space station.
SCHEDULE – WEDNESDAY 27 NOVEMBER
10:30
The Turn of The Ground in An Earth-Sky World (Online)
With Tim Ingold, moderated by Dr. Annouchka Bayley, Victoria McKenzie, Prof. Delfina Fantini van Ditmar and Virginia Tassinari
If the air is up above, and the earth down below, what lies in between? The answer is the ground. But how, then, should we describe it? Is it an interface, like a pavement, which separates the Earth from the sky, keeping each to its respective domain, or is it a zone in which earth and sky interpenetrate, allowing soil and moisture to combine with atmospheric air in the production of life? Focusing on what it means to turn the ground, in the practices of both cultivation and burial, we argue that it is alternately both. As generations come and go, the earth alternately opens to the sky and turns against it.
13:00 pm
Imagining Otherwise: Complexity, Entanglement, Epistemology
With Dr. Annouchka Bayley, moderated by Victoria McKenzie and Prof. Delfina Fantini van Ditmar
Annouchka’s presentation will take an installation workshop approach to entangle the importance of arts-based pedagogies in higher education with notions of complexity for fostering more-than-human futures. Drawing on Karen Barad’s (2007) concepts of diffraction, material-discursivity, agential realism, and entanglement, and on Lola Olufemi’s notion of ‘imagining otherwise’ she proposes the utilisation of affective, artistic, and material-discursive approaches to addressing complexity. She asks: What if building equitable futures didn’t require us to reimagine and articulate complexity issues such as nature/cultures, spaces/places, materials/systems, and even what it means to be 'human' we already know, but ways we might not yet know? What would that require of us epistemically? How could we approach this transformation within education?